Being in an artist-built environment is all-consuming; however, if you have never been to one before, it can be hard to conceptualize just how immersive the experience feels. Due to the fact that they are often built in the home and/or yard of the artist and are the product of decades-long (and sometimes a lifetime of) construction, the sites overwhelm. For my dissertation research, it has been imperative to visit and experience the extant sites of my dissertation: Mary Nohl’s Art Environment, Dr. Charles Smith’s “African American Heritage Museum and Black Veteran’s Archive,” and Sam Rodia’s “Watts Towers.”
While I was writing my first chapter, I had the special privilege of residing and researching in the Mary Nohl Art Environment for two weeks. My extended stay at the Mary Nohl House catalyzed numerous insights, but perhaps the most profound came from the juxtaposition of the archival boxes that I was sifting through each day with the immediacy of the site: I was viewing 2D materials chronicling history alongside the 3D art environment chronicling the moment. Being able to cross-examine the archive with my surroundings heightened my awareness of the sculptures that were no longer right in front of me. In the writing that follows, I will share some of my favorite sculptures from what I deem her “Impermanent Collection.”
Since Nohl’s site has very limited public access, managed by the John Michael Kohler Arts Center (JMKAC), Milwaukeeans mostly experience her site by peering through the fence. So, if you were to visit her site it would most likely be framed by your attempt to align your eye (or camera) with the fence to get an unobstructed view:
Her concrete Easter Island busts, fish friend sculptures, and eight-foot dinosaur are some of the most visible from this vantage, and thus have become staples of the site. If you were to venture to her site today, you could see them all smiling back at you. Despite the abundance of sculptures that are preserved on site currently, there are many more sculptures that have historically adorned her site that are now lost to time or housed at the JMKAC Art Preserve.
Water Mobiles
While I was paging through an archival box full of newspaper articles written on Mary Nohl, I encountered her water mobiles. They were introduced to me in “Blue Gate with ‘El Greco’ Carvings Opens New Delights to Mary Nohl and Neighbors” published by The Herald in 1964. In the article, Mary walks the journalist, Cathy Fink, around the site and provides anecdotes and extra texture for all they are observing.
In one anecdote, while explaining her first modification to the house, the hanging red fish, they discuss the inevitable decay of her sculptures out in the elements and the unfortunate and complete demise of one:
“For all of its ten to twelve years of tree swinging, the fish has held up remarkably well. This, Mary revealed, is because she has a spare fish in the garage in case winds damage and drop this one. At one time she had a boat load of bowler-hatted people floating in the lake.
‘This was great until strong waves would wash them down to Whitefish Bay, and I’d have to go down and shag them.’
One of the newest ideas on her big list is extending a cable from a rock out in the lake to the shoreline and attaching water mobiles: a boat, a fish or whale to the cable and letting it play in the waves” (25).
After reading that charming story, every time I walked the shore and gazed out over the lake, I could not help but imagine bowler-hat boaters anchored out there and riding the waves. Given her diary entries, my sense is that these water mobiles presented logistical challenges over the years; in 1968, she wrote that “one of my model boats is missing and 2 others [are] bogged down with seaweed.” The experiments with these sculptures illustrate Mary’s ethos of commitment without attachment that she practiced throughout her life of making.
Windmills and Other Wind-Blown Sculptures
In addition to out on the lake, up in the trees was another area of Mary’s site that hosted an ever-evolving exhibit. Over the years, different variations of wind chimes and driftwood carvings hung from the trees—the aforementioned red fish started in the trees (and was eventually mounted on the eastside of the house as you can see today). Specifically, the late 60s and early 70s had a lot of tree mobile movement because this was when Mary’s original fence (pictured above in The Herald article) was being targeted for theft and vandalism, so she moved her red fish and fence carvings high enough so local kids could not reach them. What destruction the kids could not accomplish, the wind would eventually do. In April of 1970, she wrote that she was “up and down ladders quite a lot” hanging and rearranging her downed tree mobiles.
Since there are no sculptures hanging in the trees today or windmills in the yard, Mary’s diary entries regarding the aural qualities of her mobiles and windmills provide a useful window into the soundscape of the site. As you can see from this photo that I took in residency, she wrote five lines per day in her five-year journals:
Post your comment
Comments
No one has commented on this page yet.